How To Vote
PUT THE GREENS LAST
Authorised and Printed by A van der Craats
How To Vote
PUT THE GREENS LAST
Authorised and Printed by A van der Craats
This is our South Yarra resident’s recommended ‘How=to-Vote’ for the forthcoming By-election ballots to be sent out late April-May.
We have decided to oppose sitting and former city councillors on the basis that they voted to support the Goodrest underground car park development and in the case of Ken Ong his proposal to remove residential parking permits.
The Greens in particular do not deserve our support. They supported the Goodrest underground carpark off Toorak Road placing our heritage at risk. (Photos of proposed development below). Why?
We have chosen to support Sally Warhaft, Columnist and media commentator to best represent the South Yarra community
City of Melbourne Traffic Engineer fails top consult residents or consider the alternative option of a Road Tunnel with above traffic servicing buses and local traffic . The costs of a “cross city” Road Tunnel between the Yarra Rver and Nepean Highway (4.3km) would be less than the amount of money wasted by the Andrews Government in scrapping the East West Link Tunnel and marginally more than the cost of the proposed road widening.
The State Government is conducting hearings on Punt Road Road Widening
Residents are asking why a Road Tunnel is not under Consideration. Some residents are concerned that the Government would over-inflate the cost of a tunnel thus ruling it out. Estimations of a tunnel with a exit ramp to Dandenong Road varies between 1 to 1.5 Billion Dollars
Extract of Article by
City Editor, The Age
Stonnington council says an option to widen Punt Road should be scrapped.
Stonnington Council says an option held since 1954, to widen Punt Road from four to six lanes, should be dumped.
Stonnington Council says an option held since 1954, to widen Punt Road from four to six lanes, should be dumped. Photo: Darrian Traynor
An option held by VicRoads since 1954 to bulldoze hundreds of properties on Punt Road to widen it for traffic should be dumped by the Andrews government, inner-city council Stonnington has argued.
But a transport advisor to Melbourne City Council has backed the need to keep the widening option in place, saying that ultimately Punt Road may need to be widened from four to six lanes so that dedicated bus lanes can be created.
And new, lower speed limits should be contemplated when permanent Punt Road clearways are introduced, the transport expert has recommended.
Public hearings began this week into whether to preserve the 2.5-kilometre public acquisition overlay along the eastern side of Punt Road.
Punt Road residents in South Yarra and Prahran want it scrapped, arguing the option to take their homes creates uncertainty and urban blight along the infamously congested arterial route – used by up to 40,000 vehicles a day.
But VicRoads wants the overlay kept, saying it will eventually be needed.
Labor went to the 2014 state election promising to review the overlay, saying it gave “locals no control over the fate of their own homes”.
Stonnington Council this week voted to ask for the Punt Road overlay to be dropped, and is appearing before the planning hearings to put its case.
The council has also highlighted the consequences for parking and traffic on side streets in South Yarra, Prahran and Windsor if Punt Road were widened.
Stonnington mayor Claude Ullin said widening Punt Road would not solve the congestion problems.
“It would just attract more traffic, as we’ve seen with all of the freeways we have. They were all built to ease traffic but now they are part of the problem.”
Cr Ullin said he had previously owned two properties on Punt Road and, in the two decades since he had sold them, traffic had not increased.
“Widening Punt Road just seems so unnecessary,” he said.
“It would create so much difficulty in terms of compensation, and all the heritage houses along there that would be destroyed.”
However an experienced transport planner hired by Melbourne City Council to give his view on the project has found that there could be a long-term need to widen Punt Road.
A six-lane road would “best cater for the long-term movement needs in the corridor”, wrote Knowles Tivendale, a principal at transport consultants Phillip Boyle and Associates.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/punt-road-widening-a-vexed-question-for-councils-on-either-side-of-the-road-20160211-gmri7j.html#ixzz3zqXMTJWo
Follow us: @theage on Twitter | theageAustralia on Facebook
Earlier this year we wrote to the Minister for Local Roads seeking detailed information as to the propose changes to Punt Road and the cost of Road widening versus a Road Tunnel.
We specifically asked
I would like to know how much world a Road tunnel under punt Road cost to construct and if he development and design of the Metro Tunnel which Cross Punt Road will impact or preclude a future Road Tunnel. Ideally the two would be constructed together.
Nathan Corcornon from Vicroads wrote back with the following reply ignoring our question
Thank you for your email in regards to Punt Road.
The ‘Punt Road Investigation’ aims to provide the government with possible short-term options to improve the corridor. The investigation aims to improve safety for all road users, help traffic flow, increase reliability of public transport and improve accessibility for cyclists and pedestrians along and across the entire corridor.
Possible improvements that are being investigated include implementing 24-hour clearways, introducing a fifth lane within the existing road reserve, east-west connectivity improvements and public transport priority measures.
Tunnels require significant financial resources and typically involve a long and disruptive construction period. At this point in time Punt Road is not as efficient as it could be, the focus of the Punt Road Investigation therefore, is to develop solutions that maximise the operation of the infrastructure we already have (i.e. Punt Road) to ensure it operates at maximum efficiency.
Additionally, only 15-20% of vehicles are travelling the majority of the length of the Hoddle-Punt corridor, therefore there will still be significant demands on the surface road network that need to be addressed.
Any options to improve Punt Road are being examined alongside the Streamlining Hoddle Street initiative which aims to improve travel times and reliability of trips along Hoddle Street.
As we are still in the ‘exploring’ phase of the project, feedback received is being used to help us prioritise areas for improvement and subsequently guide options development. These options will be presented to Government in early 2016.
Once again, thank you for your input.
Streamlining Hoddle Street & Punt Road Transport Investigation Project teams
In 2009/10 the Brumby Government looked at what to do with Hoddle Street Punt Road and cam up with a proposal for grade separation and a tunnel at budget cost of 1.5 Billion Dollars
This proposal has fallen off the radar and Nathan Conornan is apparently not aware of it.
What is of concern is that the cost of purchasing property top facilitate a road widening of Punt Road is estimated to cost around $750 Million and it will not facilitate or address the traffic concerns along Punt Road.
Contrary to the statement made by Nathan Conornan the percentage of vehicles traveling along Punt Road that travel the full length from the Yarra to Carlisle Street is greater than 80%. the 15%-20% figure he quotes is the full Hoddle/Punt Road (Clifton Hill to St Kilda) corridor.
Whats more the Metro Rail Project which will no longer stop at serve South Yarra is most likely ignored the need to design both tunnels (Road and Rail) together. The Metro rail may prohibit any future road tunnel option under Punt Road.
State Planning at its worst. Again the Government is remaining numb on these issues. Metro Rail is not talking to Vicroads and both are not talking to the community. They certainly are not listening.
In a highly disappointing announcement the proposed Melbourne Metro Train will bypass South Yarra.
When taken into consider with the proposed changes to Tram number 8 South Yarra will not have a direct route to Melbourne University further isolating South Yarra Residents, This will result in halving South Yarra’s Transport options and makes a mockery of South Yarra Planning and development. South Yarra has a number of high rise high density developement that are specifically aimed at the student market.
Having lost the Seat of Prahran in 2014 the State Government has shown no interest or concern over South Yarra residents who have been ignored in the consultation and planning of Melbourne’s Transport Plans
The Melbourne South Yarra Residents Group is planning to hold its Annual General Meeting on November 12 at which Melbourne Metro is listed for discussion